サイセイサン ヒョウシキ ニオケル シホン ブンプ ニツイテ 3 : シャカイテキ ヘイキン シホン オ セイリツ サセル シホン ブンプ ニオイテ カクブメン シホン ガ ランダム ニ ダイブモン ニ ゾクスル バアイ
Departmental Bulletin Paper
A theoretical consistency between the value structure of “the average social capital” (illustrated in “Capital: Volume III”, “Chapter IX and Chapter X”) and that of two departments of reproduction (illustrated in “Capital: Volume II”, “Chapter XX. Simple Reproduction” and "Chapter XXI. Accumulation and Reproduction on an Extended Scale”) is examined.
In the process, the numerical example of the first year of reproduction schemes is used, and the number of circulation of Capitals is premised as 1 for comparing both value structures of capitals.
The conclusion is that the spectrum of capitals in Marx's reproduction scheme is not always compatible with the spectrum of capitals of Marx's average social capital, therefore, c:v ratio in Marx's reproduction scheme does not presuppose the spectrum of capital of average social capital, and not provide it, too.
The conclusion is not a general proof for its strict conditions, but this means the counter example against to its logic. The value concept, therefore, seems to be redefined under the reproduction scheme.
LID201505205004.pdf 2.44 MB
Integrated Arts and Sciences