Total for the last 12 months
number of access : ?
number of downloads : ?
ID 117917
Author
Sekiguchi, Ryo Tokushima University
Matsuda, Miyuki Tokushima University
Keywords
Fraction of inspired oxygen
FIO2
Oxygen mask
Oxygen therapy
Surgical mask
Content Type
Journal Article
Description
Purpose: We investigated the impact of surgical masks (SM) during oxygen therapy using oxygen masks in volunteer- and simulation-based studies.
Methods: Fifteen volunteers wore the Hudson RCI® or Open-Face Mask® with/without an SM. The fraction of inspired oxygen concentration (FIO2), end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2), partial pressure of inspired CO2 (PICO2), and respiratory rate (RR) were measured. The oxygen flow rate increased from 0 to 10 L/min. In the simulation-based study, FIO2 was measured using a simulator that reproduced spontaneous breathing. RR was 12 or 24 bpm, and the tidal volume (Tv) was 300, 500, or 700 mL. The effect of oxygen mask fitting conditions were also examined. The primary outcome measure was FIO2 at 6 L/min.
Results: In the volunteer-based study, FIO2 was reduced when the SM was used with the Hudson RCI® or Open-Face Mask®. The FIO2 drop was larger with the Open-Face Mask® than with the Hudson RCI®. The RR, EtCO2, and PICO2 significantly changed with the SM, but the differences were not clinically meaningful. In the simulation-based study, the SM with the Hudson RCI® did not reduce FIO2, but the SM with the Open-Face Mask® significantly decreased FIO2 under several conditions. However, the SM with the Hudson Mask® reduced FIO2 when the fit of the mask was inadequate. With the Open-Face Mask®, lower RR and Tv resulted in larger differences in FIO2.
Conclusions: The SM decreased FIO2 during oxygen therapy with oxygen masks. The impact of SM depended on the type of the oxygen mask, mask fitting, and respiratory condition.
Journal Title
Journal of Anesthesia
ISSN
14388359
09138668
NCID
AA10852931
Publisher
Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists|Springer Nature
Volume
36
Issue
5
Start Page
633
End Page
641
Published Date
2022-06-16
Remark
This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use (https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/accepted-manuscript-terms), but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00540-022-03083-2
EDB ID
DOI (Published Version)
URL ( Publisher's Version )
FullText File
language
eng
TextVersion
Author
departments
University Hospital
Medical Sciences