Satomi, Shiho Tokushima University Tokushima University Educator and Researcher Directory KAKEN Search Researchers
Kakuta, Nami Tokushima University Tokushima University Educator and Researcher Directory KAKEN Search Researchers
Murakami, Chiaki Tokushima University
Sakai, Yoko Tokushima University Tokushima University Educator and Researcher Directory KAKEN Search Researchers
Tanaka, Katsuya Tokushima University Tokushima University Educator and Researcher Directory KAKEN Search Researchers
Thesis or Dissertation
Background. It is well known that the programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) technique effectively provides epidural anesthesia in labor. This randomized double-blind trial compared the postoperative analgesic efficacy of PIEB with that of continuous epidural infusion (CEI) in patients undergoing gynecological surgery under combined general-epidural anesthesia. Methods. Patients undergoing open gynecological surgery under combined general-epidural anesthesia were randomized at a 1 : 1 ratio to receive PIEB or CEI. In the PIEB group, the pump delivered 4mL ropivacaine 0.2% plus fentanyl 2 𝜇g/mL every hour. In the CEI group, the pump delivered the same solution at a rate of 4 mL/h. In both groups, additional 4mL boluses of ropivacaine 0.2% plus fentanyl 2 𝜇g/mL were provided, when necessary, by patient-controlled epidural analgesia after surgery. The primary outcome was the total ropivacaine dose 40 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes were the number of PCEA boluses and postoperative pain (evaluated on an 11-point numerical rating scale) 3, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. Results. In total, 57 patients were randomized (𝑛 = 28 and 29 in the PIEB and CEI groups, resp.). The two groups differ significantly in terms of the total ropivacaine dose 40 hours after surgery (mean (standard deviation): 155.38 (4.55) versus 159.73 (7.87) mL, 𝑃 = 0.016). Compared to the CEI group, the PIEB group had significantly lower numerical rating scale scores 3 hours (median [lower–upper quartiles]: 0 [0–0.5] versus 3 [0–5.5], 𝑃 = 0.002), 24 hours (1 [0–2] versus 3 [1–4], 𝑃 = 0.003), and 48 hours (1 [0–2] versus 2 [2–3.5], 𝑃 = 0.002) after surgery. Conclusion. PIEB was better than CEI in terms of providing postoperative analgesia after open gynecological surgery under combined general-epidural anesthesia.
BioMed Research International
本論文は, 著者Shiho Satomiの学位論文として提出され, 学位審査・授与の対象となっている。
Copyright © 2018 Shiho Satomi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
|DOI (Published Version)|
|URL ( Publisher's Version )|
k3250_abstract_review.pdf 208 KB
k3250_fulltext.pdf 1.66 MB
|MEXT report number||
Doctor of Medical Science