再生産表式における資本分布について(2) : 社会的平均資本を成立させる等差で並べられた諸部面資本を，特定の部面資本が，異なるc:v比を持つ2大部門に分割する場合

A theoretrical consistency between the value structure of “average social capital” (illustrated in “Capital: Volume III”, “Chapter IX and Chapter X”) and that of two departments of reproduction (illustrated in “Capital: Volume II”, “Chapter XX. Simple Reproduction” and “Chapter XXI. Accumulation and Reproduction on an Extended Scale”) is examined.
For comparing these two value structure, the number of circulation of each capital in reproduction is assumed to be the same i.e. 1. Furthermore, a specific capital segments all capitals into two departments of reproduction, and the ratio of the first year of reproduction is used for this comparing.
The conclusion is that the Marx's reproduction scheme is not always compatible with the spectrum of capitals including average social capital. This work does not show a general proof, but means that Marx's numerical example contains the counter example in itself, and this conclusion is contradictory to his own description.