ID | 118909 |
Title Alternative | Cluster analysis after TAVR
|
Author |
Kusunose, Kenya
University of the Ryukyus|Tokushima University
Tokushima University Educator and Researcher Directory
KAKEN Search Researchers
Tsuji, Takumasa
Teikyo University
Hirata, Yukina
Tokushima University
Sata, Masataka
Tokushima University
Tokushima University Educator and Researcher Directory
KAKEN Search Researchers
Sato, Kimi
University of Tsukuba
Albakaa, Noor
University of Tsukuba
Ishizu, Tomoko
University of Tsukuba
Kotoku, Jun’ichi
Teikyo University
Seo, Yoshihiro
Nagoya City University
|
Keywords | Artificial intelligence
Machine learning
Aortic stenosis
Echocardiography
|
Content Type |
Journal Article
|
Description | Aims
The aim of this study was to identify phenotypes with potential prognostic significance in aortic stenosis (AS) patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) through a clustering approach. Methods and results This multi-centre retrospective study included 1365 patients with severe AS who underwent TAVR between January 2015 and March 2019. Among demographics, laboratory, and echocardiography parameters, 20 variables were selected through dimension reduction and used for unsupervised clustering. Phenotypes and outcomes were compared between clusters. Patients were randomly divided into a derivation cohort (n = 1092: 80%) and a validation cohort (n = 273: 20%). Three clusters with markedly different features were identified. Cluster 1 was associated predominantly with elderly age, a high aortic valve gradient, and left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy; Cluster 2 consisted of preserved LV ejection fraction, larger aortic valve area, and high blood pressure; and Cluster 3 demonstrated tachycardia and low flow/low gradient AS. Adverse outcomes differed significantly among clusters during a median of 2.2 years of follow-up (P < 0.001). After adjustment for clinical and echocardiographic data in a Cox proportional hazards model, Cluster 3 (hazard ratio, 4.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.76–9.94; P = 0.001) was associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes. In sequential Cox models, a model based on clinical data and echocardiographic variables (χ2 = 18.4) was improved by Cluster 3 (χ2 = 31.5; P = 0.001) in the validation cohort. Conclusion Unsupervised cluster analysis of patients after TAVR revealed three different groups for assessment of prognosis. This provides a new perspective in the categorization of patients after TAVR that considers comorbidities and extravalvular cardiac dysfunction. |
Journal Title |
European Heart Journal Open
|
ISSN | 27524191
|
Publisher | Oxford University Press|European Society of Cardiology
|
Volume | 4
|
Issue | 1
|
Start Page | oead136
|
Published Date | 2023-12-20
|
Rights | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
|
EDB ID | |
DOI (Published Version) | |
URL ( Publisher's Version ) | |
FullText File | |
language |
eng
|
TextVersion |
Publisher
|
departments |
University Hospital
Medical Sciences
|