ID | 117340 |
Title Alternative | Medical Devices for Parkinson’s Disease
|
Author |
Morigaki, Ryoma
Tokushima University
Tokushima University Educator and Researcher Directory
KAKEN Search Researchers
Nakanishi, Hiroshi
Tokushima University
Izumi, Yuishin
Tokushima University
Tokushima University Educator and Researcher Directory
KAKEN Search Researchers
|
Keywords | Parkinson’s disease
tremor
freezing of gait (FOG)
gait
stimulation
invasive medical devices
non-invasive medical device
|
Content Type |
Journal Article
|
Description | Background: Pharmacotherapy is the first-line treatment option for Parkinson’s disease, and levodopa is considered the most effective drug for managing motor symptoms. However, side effects such as motor fluctuation and dyskinesia have been associated with levodopa treatment. For these conditions, alternative therapies, including invasive and non-invasive medical devices, may be helpful. This review sheds light on current progress in the development of devices to alleviate motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease.
Methods: We first conducted a narrative literature review to obtain an overview of current invasive and non-invasive medical devices and thereafter performed a systematic review of recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of these devices. Results: Our review revealed different characteristics of each device and their effectiveness for motor symptoms. Although invasive medical devices are usually highly effective, surgical procedures can be burdensome for patients and have serious side effects. In contrast, non-pharmacological/non-surgical devices have fewer complications. RCTs of non-invasive devices, especially non-invasive brain stimulation and mechanical peripheral stimulation devices, have proven effectiveness on motor symptoms. Nearly no non-invasive devices have yet received Food and Drug Administration certification or a CE mark. Conclusion: Invasive and non-invasive medical devices have unique characteristics, and several RCTs have been conducted for each device. Invasive devices are more effective, while non-invasive devices are less effective and have lower hurdles and risks. It is important to understand the characteristics of each device and capitalize on these. |
Journal Title |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
|
ISSN | 16634365
|
Publisher | Frontiers Media S.A.
|
Volume | 14
|
Start Page | 807909
|
Published Date | 2022-03-29
|
Rights | This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
|
EDB ID | |
DOI (Published Version) | |
URL ( Publisher's Version ) | |
FullText File | |
language |
eng
|
TextVersion |
Publisher
|
departments |
Medical Sciences
University Hospital
|