ID | 115537 |
タイトル別表記 | ICBT survey for cervical cancer
|
著者 |
Toita, Takafumi
Okinawa Chubu Hospital
Ohno, Tatsuya
Gunma University
Nishimura, Tetsuo
Shizuoka Cancer Center
Uno, Takashi
Chiba University
Ogawa, Kazuhiko
Osaka University
Onishi, Hiroshi
University of Yamanashi
Dokiya, Takushi
Kyoundo Hospital
Itami, Jun
National Cancer Center Hospital
|
キーワード | cervix neoplasms
radiotherapy
image-guided
brachytherapy
surveys and questionnaires
|
資料タイプ |
学術雑誌論文
|
抄録 | To review the current status of, and labor expended for (in terms of time required), intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) in definitive radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer patients, two national surveys were performed. The first survey was conducted between July and August 2016 and consisted of a questionnaire of 12 items regarding ICBT procedures for cervical cancer, which was sent to 173 centers installed with high-dose-rate remote after-loading brachytherapy systems. Between November and December 2016, another survey was performed in 79 centers to evaluate labor required for ICBT procedures in terms of time spent and number of staff involved. In the first survey, the response rate was 77% of the 173 centers. ICBT was performed for cervical cancer in 118 (89%) centers. Imaging modalities used after applicator insertion were X-ray alone in 46 (40%), computed tomography in 69 (60%) and magnetic resonance imaging in 5 (4%) centers. Three-dimensional (3D) planning was performed in 55 centers (48%). Fifty-five (70%) centers responded to the second survey regarding ICBT-mandated labor. The median cumulative duration of the entire ICBT procedure was 330 min (the sum of the times spent by each staff member) and was longer in the 3D image–guided brachytherapy (3D-IGBT) (405 min) than in the X-ray group (230 min). This trend was significant for the specific processes of image acquisition and treatment planning, especially for radiation oncologists. In definitive radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer patients, 3D-IGBT use has been gradually spreading in Japan. The present survey revealed that ICBT, especially 3D-IGBT, requires substantial labor and time from staff.
|
掲載誌名 |
Journal of Radiation Research
|
ISSN | 13499157
|
cat書誌ID | AA00705792
|
出版者 | Oxford University Press|The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology
|
巻 | 59
|
号 | 4
|
開始ページ | 469
|
終了ページ | 476
|
発行日 | 2018-07-06
|
備考 | 所属英表記誤記あり (誤)Gumma University→(正)Gunma University
|
権利情報 | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial reuse, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
|
EDB ID | |
出版社版DOI | |
出版社版URL | |
フルテキストファイル | |
言語 |
eng
|
著者版フラグ |
出版社版
|
部局 |
医学系
|