Evaluation of segmental mobility in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis : A comparison of images from standing flexion-extension and standing / supine slippage

Purpose : To evaluate segmental mobility with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS), upright lateral flexion-extension radiographs (FE) are widely used. However, some authors have described that a combination of lateral radiographs in the standing position and supine sagittal image (SS) reveal more segmental mobility than FE. The purpose of this study was to investigate the optimal method for evaluating segmental mobility with DLS. Methods : We included 92 consecutive Japanese patients diagnosed with DLS. Sagittal translation (ST) determined by FE and SS were compared. Pathological instability was defined as ST more than 8% of the upper vertebra. Patients were divided into those diagnosed with pathological instability in FE (PI-FE) and those diagnosed with SS (PI-SS), and lumbar lordosis (LL) in the standing position in each group were compared. Results : ST in FE was significantly greater than in SS. Of 92 patients, 31 had pathological instability in FE or SS ; 17 patients had PI-FE, and 10 patients had PI-SS. LL in the standing position in PI-FE was significantly smaller than in PI-SS. Conclusions : ST in FE was greater than that in SS, contrary to previous studies’ reports on Caucasians. Since Japanese individuals have smaller LL than Caucasians, FE tends to reveal more segmental mobility than SS.