ID | 119389 |
タイトル別表記 | Sex Differences in Stress-coping Strategies
|
著者 |
Nagayoshi, Mako
Nagoya University
Takeuchi, Kenji
Nagoya University
Tamada, Yudai
Nagoya University
Kato, Yasufumi
Nagoya University
Kubo, Yoko
Nagoya University
Okada, Rieko
Nagoya University
Tamura, Takashi
Nagoya University
Hishida, Asahi
Nagoya University
Otonari, Jun
Kyushu University|International University of Health and Welfare
Ikezaki, Hiroaki
Kyushu University
Nishida, Yuichiro
Saga University
Shimanoe, Chisato
Saga University
Koyanagi, Yuriko N.
Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute
Matsuo, Keitaro
Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute
Mikami, Haruo
Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute
Kusakabe, Miho
Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute
Nishimoto, Daisaku
Kagoshima University
Shibuya, Keiichi
Kagoshima University
Suzuki, Sadao
Nagoya City University
Nishiyama, Takeshi
Nagoya City University
Ozaki, Etsuko
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
Watanabe, Isao
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
Kuriki, Kiyonori
University of Shizuoka
Takashima, Naoyuki
Kindai University|Shiga University of Medical Science
Kadota, Aya
Shiga University of Medical Science
Wakai, Kenji
Nagoya University
|
キーワード | sex differences
stress coping strategies
perceived stress
all-cause mortality
Japan
|
資料タイプ |
学術雑誌論文
|
抄録 | Background: Stress coping strategies are related to health outcomes. However, there is no clear evidence for sex differences between stress-coping strategies and mortality. We investigated the relationship between all-cause mortality and stress-coping strategies, focusing on sex differences among Japanese adults.
Methods: A total of 79,580 individuals aged 35–69 years participated in the Japan Multi-Institutional Collaborative Cohort Study between 2004 and 2014 and were followed up for mortality. The frequency of use of the five coping strategies was assessed using a questionnaire. Sex-specific, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for using each coping strategy (“sometimes,” and “often/very often” use versus “very few” use) were computed for all-cause mortality. Furthermore, relationships were analyzed in specific follow-up periods when the proportion assumption was violated. Results: During the follow-up (median: 8.5 years), 1,861 mortalities were recorded. In women, three coping strategies were related to lower total mortality. The HRs for “sometimes” were 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67–0.97) for emotional expression, 0.79 (95% CI, 0.66–0.95) for emotional support-seeking, and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.66–0.98) for disengagement. Men who “sometimes” used emotional expression and sometimes or often used problem-solving and positive reappraisal had a 15–41% lower HRs for all-cause mortality. However, those relationships were dependent on the follow-up period. There was evidence that sex modified the relationships between emotional support-seeking and all-cause mortality (P for interaction = 0.03). Conclusion: In a large Japanese sample, selected coping strategies were associated with all-cause mortality. The relationship of emotional support-seeking was different between men and women. |
掲載誌名 |
Journal of Epidemiology
|
ISSN | 13499092
09175040
|
cat書誌ID | AA10952696
|
出版者 | Japan Epidemiological Association
|
巻 | 33
|
号 | 5
|
開始ページ | 236
|
終了ページ | 245
|
発行日 | 2023-05-05
|
権利情報 | This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
|
EDB ID | |
出版社版DOI | |
出版社版URL | |
フルテキストファイル | |
言語 |
eng
|
著者版フラグ |
出版社版
|
部局 |
医学系
|